<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile in Belgium is expensive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mobileweb.be/2009/03/30/mobile-in-belgium-is-expensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mobileweb.be/2009/03/30/mobile-in-belgium-is-expensive/</link>
	<description>Latest news about mobile apps, mobile publishing and business SMS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blog.mobileweb.be/2009/03/30/mobile-in-belgium-is-expensive/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 09:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mobileweb.be/?p=809#comment-1215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really don&#039;t believe introducing a 4th operator on a little market such as Belgium would do any good for the consumer. Whether they are 3 or 4, they can still agree between themselves about the lowest acceptable rates - 4 is still an oligopoly. 

No, the issues are elsewhere according to me :
- total lack of creativity regarding mobile-based services from our operators. They are still on that old stupid model of ringtones and SMS based services, a crappy wap portal... This is so sad and such a waste of resource. Instead of developing showcases like mobile TV which nobody is interested in, they&#039;d better understand the shift of trends and directions taking place right now in the telecom area.
- very expensive mobile Internet rates, slowing down the adoption and usage of smartphones or other communicating devices
- impossible for operators to create bundles with (sponsored) phones - this makes so that the GSM population in Belgium remains old and does not accelerate the development and adoption of new mobile services. THIS LAW MUST BE CHANGED !!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t believe introducing a 4th operator on a little market such as Belgium would do any good for the consumer. Whether they are 3 or 4, they can still agree between themselves about the lowest acceptable rates &#8211; 4 is still an oligopoly. </p>
<p>No, the issues are elsewhere according to me :<br />
- total lack of creativity regarding mobile-based services from our operators. They are still on that old stupid model of ringtones and SMS based services, a crappy wap portal&#8230; This is so sad and such a waste of resource. Instead of developing showcases like mobile TV which nobody is interested in, they&#8217;d better understand the shift of trends and directions taking place right now in the telecom area.<br />
- very expensive mobile Internet rates, slowing down the adoption and usage of smartphones or other communicating devices<br />
- impossible for operators to create bundles with (sponsored) phones &#8211; this makes so that the GSM population in Belgium remains old and does not accelerate the development and adoption of new mobile services. THIS LAW MUST BE CHANGED !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

